MattyA Posted October 29, 2006 Report Share Posted October 29, 2006 (edited) Anyone thought of fitting these, indicator handles? border="0" class="linked-image" /> border="0" alt="" />Im not sure how they would look? style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":confused:" border="0" alt="confused.gif" />I imagine once they were colour coded and the wing indicators removed, might look quiet good. Edited October 29, 2006 by matt a Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Picola Posted October 29, 2006 Report Share Posted October 29, 2006 Pile o' pooIMO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattyA Posted October 29, 2006 Author Report Share Posted October 29, 2006 Pile o' pooIMOCharming! style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="biggrin.gif" /> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babs Posted October 29, 2006 Report Share Posted October 29, 2006 and surely in the wrong place (legally) for side repeaters? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattyA Posted October 29, 2006 Author Report Share Posted October 29, 2006 and surely in the wrong place (legally) for side repeaters?Yeah could well be! style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":wacko:" border="0" alt="wacko.gif" /> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luke's lupo Posted October 31, 2006 Report Share Posted October 31, 2006 (edited) you don't need side repeaters by law in this country style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" />however if you have them both have to be working same situation as 3rd brake light Edited October 31, 2006 by luke's lupo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbeth! Posted October 31, 2006 Report Share Posted October 31, 2006 you don't need side repeaters by law in this country style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" />however if you have them both have to be working same situation as 3rd brake lightI thought the law was something to do with being able to see an indicating action whilst standing 1 metre out from the rear bumper, looking straight ahead?Dont know where Ive got that from, so dont quote me, as its most probably male cow dung! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitchell Posted November 1, 2006 Report Share Posted November 1, 2006 from 1986 onwards a car is required by law to have visible side indicators. mot failure if not fitted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr ColinG Posted November 1, 2006 Report Share Posted November 1, 2006 from 1986 onwards a car is required by law to have visible side indicators. mot failure if not fittedYeah, side indicators, but they dont have to be on the wing, a lot are on Mirrors now.My bosses RangeRover Sports are on the door, which i thought was strange.Back on topic, not keen . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAM Posted November 1, 2006 Report Share Posted November 1, 2006 im not sure really. may look odd with flashing door handles.although if you blacked them out and maybe changed them to white, they make look cool turning on when you unlocked it to show where the handles were. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.